<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Clearinghouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406</link>
	<description>Magnitude 6.3 on April 4, 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Observations from EERI/PEER Team by Eric Namisniak</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/obervations-from-eeripeer-team/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Namisniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=197#comment-370</guid>
		<description>The Pantheon in Rome is a world icon of permanence. It has withstood nearly 20 centuries of wear and tear since its construction in 125 A.D. Its function has changed numerous times as well as the people who use it, but still it remains standing as an example of Rome’s antiquity. Today, it is supported by the people that are drawn to it. Locals and tourists both flock to this monument to see its grandeur.

This post is one piece to a string of images and coments to bring awareness to the recent earthquake in the Abruzzo region of Italy. Towns such as L’Aquila and Castelvecchio Calvisio are left damaged and crumbled from this unfortunate event. Rome is an example of restoration and preservation not only of architecture and art, but of culture. In this way, Rome can be an example and even help to the Abruzzo region because of its familiarity with these issues. To follow this string, click this link to the next image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/22618126@N03/4109521163/in/set-72157622796931841/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pantheon in Rome is a world icon of permanence. It has withstood nearly 20 centuries of wear and tear since its construction in 125 A.D. Its function has changed numerous times as well as the people who use it, but still it remains standing as an example of Rome’s antiquity. Today, it is supported by the people that are drawn to it. Locals and tourists both flock to this monument to see its grandeur.</p>
<p>This post is one piece to a string of images and coments to bring awareness to the recent earthquake in the Abruzzo region of Italy. Towns such as L’Aquila and Castelvecchio Calvisio are left damaged and crumbled from this unfortunate event. Rome is an example of restoration and preservation not only of architecture and art, but of culture. In this way, Rome can be an example and even help to the Abruzzo region because of its familiarity with these issues. To follow this string, click this link to the next image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/22618126@N03/4109521163/in/set-72157622796931841/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/22618126@N03/4109521163/in/set-72157622796931841/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Onna vs. Monticchio by Corrado Mastropietro</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/263/comment-page-1#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrado Mastropietro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=263#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Thanks for spreading these informations out of Italy, it&#039;s very useful! I&#039;m doing the same in Italy, running a website with daily updates about L&#039;Aquila earthquake ( www.6aprile2009.it ) with a lot of photos and earthquake technical data, but it&#039;s only in italian language. I&#039;m going to translate it in english as well.
Keep on taking the focus on L&#039;Aquila earthquake! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for spreading these informations out of Italy, it&#8217;s very useful! I&#8217;m doing the same in Italy, running a website with daily updates about L&#8217;Aquila earthquake ( <a href="http://www.6aprile2009.it" rel="nofollow">http://www.6aprile2009.it</a> ) with a lot of photos and earthquake technical data, but it&#8217;s only in italian language. I&#8217;m going to translate it in english as well.<br />
Keep on taking the focus on L&#8217;Aquila earthquake! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damage photos from Onna by Joao Cunha</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/damage-photos-from-onna/comment-page-1#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Joao Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=84#comment-222</guid>
		<description>If youn need some more photos of Onna or L´Aquila, please say something. Im a portuguese journalist who was there, working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If youn need some more photos of Onna or L´Aquila, please say something. Im a portuguese journalist who was there, working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Observations on RC construction from EERI Team by Ing Michele Fringuelli</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/observations-on-rc-construction-from-eeri-team/comment-page-1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ing Michele Fringuelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=222#comment-219</guid>
		<description>According to the preesisting italian code, class 2 gave a seismic intensity coefficient which could be evaluated by the expression: C = S-2/100 i.e. 9-2/100 = 0.07 for class 2. 
This was used to calculate the spectral acceleration needed to solve linear elastic modal analysis, without considering reduction of spectral ordinate due to inelastic behaviour.However in 60s and 70s (and later) the seismic intensity coefficient was used (by engineers without computers) as a parameter to convert vertical load into horizontal load in linear static equivalent analysis, allowed (suggested) by the building code. 

Then according to OPCM3274 approved in 2003, class 2 provides a horizontal aceleration of 0.25 g, which is assigned to an average seismic event for italian country. 

Meanwhile the new building code, approved in 2005 and effective since 2008, introduces for each town a PGA, evaluated by geographical coordinates  provided by I.N.G.V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the preesisting italian code, class 2 gave a seismic intensity coefficient which could be evaluated by the expression: C = S-2/100 i.e. 9-2/100 = 0.07 for class 2.<br />
This was used to calculate the spectral acceleration needed to solve linear elastic modal analysis, without considering reduction of spectral ordinate due to inelastic behaviour.However in 60s and 70s (and later) the seismic intensity coefficient was used (by engineers without computers) as a parameter to convert vertical load into horizontal load in linear static equivalent analysis, allowed (suggested) by the building code. </p>
<p>Then according to OPCM3274 approved in 2003, class 2 provides a horizontal aceleration of 0.25 g, which is assigned to an average seismic event for italian country. </p>
<p>Meanwhile the new building code, approved in 2005 and effective since 2008, introduces for each town a PGA, evaluated by geographical coordinates  provided by I.N.G.V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GEER findings &#8211; damage patterns by Marco Mucciarelli</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/uncategorized/geer-findings-damage-patterns/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Mucciarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=131#comment-24</guid>
		<description>We are carring out measurement of soil fundamental frequency all over the area (about 150 sites). We observed striking differences correlating with damage enhancements. About 130 site were already processed and their HVSR curves are visible downloading this Google Earth file:
http://www.unibas.it/utenti/mucciarelli/aquila/HVSR.zip
Some &quot;odd couples&quot; are described in more detail at this site (sorry, in Italian only):
http://www.stampa.cnr.it/DocUfficioStampa/comunicati/italiano/2009/Aprile/31_APR_2009.HTM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are carring out measurement of soil fundamental frequency all over the area (about 150 sites). We observed striking differences correlating with damage enhancements. About 130 site were already processed and their HVSR curves are visible downloading this Google Earth file:<br />
<a href="http://www.unibas.it/utenti/mucciarelli/aquila/HVSR.zip" rel="nofollow">http://www.unibas.it/utenti/mucciarelli/aquila/HVSR.zip</a><br />
Some &#8220;odd couples&#8221; are described in more detail at this site (sorry, in Italian only):<br />
<a href="http://www.stampa.cnr.it/DocUfficioStampa/comunicati/italiano/2009/Aprile/31_APR_2009.HTM" rel="nofollow">http://www.stampa.cnr.it/DocUfficioStampa/comunicati/italiano/2009/Aprile/31_APR_2009.HTM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Observations from Degenkolb Engineers &#8211; Building Performance in L&#8217;Aquila by ingmstaicu</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/observations-from-degenkolb-engineers-building-performance-in-laquila/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>ingmstaicu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=150#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hello, I&#039;m a civil building engineer in Italy (apologize me for my poor english!).
I only wanted to evidence the fact that is a normal practice on the italian cantilevers not to do the confinement throught the joint, even if the structural engineers ask for it. Its a real problem, because for the esthetic reasons, only in special situations are accepted the &quot;hight beams&quot; (b&lt;h). Normally are used the beams with the same hight of the ceilings (for the civile habitations, with normal dimensions about 24-28 cm) and the large of 70-80cm. You have to imagine the external beams that generally have an eccentric position. In a joint high of 24cm, with eccentric beams (even for 30cm) none confines it or if the structural engineer insists, is done something very.... easy).
I noticed that the italian tradition of one direction reinforced ceilings (are used little beams of 10-12cm*24cm/50cm and with orizontal bricks between them, just to make easier the celings) its not so good, even if  some steel bars are put too on the other direction (I can send you some photos if you are interested in knowing more about this kind on ceilings). In this way, its not respected the calcul consideration that the ceiling is infinitely rigid into its plan, in the both of the principal directions. What about the different materials (brick and concrete?).
About the areas severely affected, the cast in place reinforced concrete suffered less, but almost all had the problem of the divisors anchorages up and down.
Thanks for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I&#8217;m a civil building engineer in Italy (apologize me for my poor english!).<br />
I only wanted to evidence the fact that is a normal practice on the italian cantilevers not to do the confinement throught the joint, even if the structural engineers ask for it. Its a real problem, because for the esthetic reasons, only in special situations are accepted the &#8220;hight beams&#8221; (b&lt;h). Normally are used the beams with the same hight of the ceilings (for the civile habitations, with normal dimensions about 24-28 cm) and the large of 70-80cm. You have to imagine the external beams that generally have an eccentric position. In a joint high of 24cm, with eccentric beams (even for 30cm) none confines it or if the structural engineer insists, is done something very&#8230;. easy).<br />
I noticed that the italian tradition of one direction reinforced ceilings (are used little beams of 10-12cm*24cm/50cm and with orizontal bricks between them, just to make easier the celings) its not so good, even if  some steel bars are put too on the other direction (I can send you some photos if you are interested in knowing more about this kind on ceilings). In this way, its not respected the calcul consideration that the ceiling is infinitely rigid into its plan, in the both of the principal directions. What about the different materials (brick and concrete?).<br />
About the areas severely affected, the cast in place reinforced concrete suffered less, but almost all had the problem of the divisors anchorages up and down.<br />
Thanks for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Observations on RC construction from EERI Team by silviocalvi</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/observations-on-rc-construction-from-eeri-team/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>silviocalvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=222#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;&gt;.
I have a correction and a question.
- L&#039;Aquila was considered in Class 2 seismic area since 1915, at the time of the Avezzano earthquake.
- Where did you get the information that Class 2 required a design for a horizontal aceeleration of 0.25g?
As far as my knowledge goes,  the requirement for a class 2 building was to design it with a horizontal force of  0.07g.

Silvio Calvi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;&gt;.<br />
I have a correction and a question.<br />
- L&#8217;Aquila was considered in Class 2 seismic area since 1915, at the time of the Avezzano earthquake.<br />
- Where did you get the information that Class 2 required a design for a horizontal aceeleration of 0.25g?<br />
As far as my knowledge goes,  the requirement for a class 2 building was to design it with a horizontal force of  0.07g.</p>
<p>Silvio Calvi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EERI/PEER team visits San Salvatore hospital by Hussain Bhatia</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/eeripeer-team-visits-san-salvatore-hospital/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Hussain Bhatia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=226#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&quot;little structural damage&quot; is not consistent with &quot;severe column damage in the pharmacy area... collapse hazard&quot;.

Also my experience is that most medical equipment is rather sensitive and if unanchored equipment  moved then it may be damaged even though it may not appear to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;little structural damage&#8221; is not consistent with &#8220;severe column damage in the pharmacy area&#8230; collapse hazard&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also my experience is that most medical equipment is rather sensitive and if unanchored equipment  moved then it may be damaged even though it may not appear to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Observations from Degenkolb Engineers &#8211; Building Performance in L&#8217;Aquila by Donald R. Logan, P.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/structural-observations/observations-from-degenkolb-engineers-building-performance-in-laquila/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald R. Logan, P.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=150#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Re:  Olympia Hotel, is it a shear wall building, and if so is it reinforced masonry, cast-in-place reinforced concrete, etc?  Is it close to areas suffering severe damage?

Within areas severely affected, are there stuctures that suffered little to no damage?  What can be deduced regarding their successful performance?

Of the simples concrete frame buildings with brillte tile infill, was there a relationship between the degree of full height infill in orthogonal directions and their performance,  compared to those with more interuptions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Olympia Hotel, is it a shear wall building, and if so is it reinforced masonry, cast-in-place reinforced concrete, etc?  Is it close to areas suffering severe damage?</p>
<p>Within areas severely affected, are there stuctures that suffered little to no damage?  What can be deduced regarding their successful performance?</p>
<p>Of the simples concrete frame buildings with brillte tile infill, was there a relationship between the degree of full height infill in orthogonal directions and their performance,  compared to those with more interuptions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Main Shock Time Histories from station AQV (provided by M.Celebi, USGS) by bykovtsev</title>
		<link>http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/uncategorized/plots-from-station-aqv-provided-by-mcelebi-usgs/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>bykovtsev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/italy-090406/?p=98#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Can you provide information about station location and epicenter location. What about distance from station to epicenter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide information about station location and epicenter location. What about distance from station to epicenter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

